Workplace deviant behaviour : does psychological contract violation matter? An empirical evidence

  • Abdul Rahim A
  • Mohd. Nasurdin A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Workplace deviant behaviour refers to "the voluntary behaviour that violates significant organizational norms". In this study, 355 manufacturing industry employees participated in an investigation into the impact of Psychological Contract Violation (PCV) on Workplace Deviant Behaviour (WDB). Three forms of deviant behaviour were identified: interpersonal deviance, production deviance, and property deviance. Further to this three PCV dimensions were also identified, namely, growth and development, autonomy and organizational support. The regression analyses performed yielded mixed results. PCV with respect to 'autonomy and control' demonstrated a negative relationship with interpersonal deviance and property deviance, but a positive relationship with production deviance. PCV with regard to 'growth and development' was found to exhibit a negative relationship with interpersonal deviance, but a positive relationship with property deviance. 'Organizational support' PCV exhibited no significant relationship with WDB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdul Rahim, A. R., & Mohd. Nasurdin, A. (2011). Workplace deviant behaviour : does psychological contract violation matter? An empirical evidence. Social and Management Research Journal, 8(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v8i2.5202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free