Ultrasound versus biological markers in the evaluation of periportal fibrosis in human Schistosoma mansoni

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the authors review the literature and share their experience of the principal biological markers of fibrosis for the evaluation of periportal fibrosis (PPF) caused by mansoni schistosomiasis. These biological markers are compared to diagnostic ultrasound (US) scans as means of grading PPF. We also review procollagen type I and III, collagen type IV, laminin, hyaluronic acid (HA), immunoglobulin G, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase as markers of the disease. Although there are several good markers for evaluating PPF and portal hypertension, such as HA, platelets or APRI, none can yet replace US. These markers may, however, be used to identify patients at greater risk of developing advanced disease in endemic areas and determine who will need further care and US studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domingues, A. L. C., de Medeiros, T. B., & de Almeida Lopes, E. P. (2011). Ultrasound versus biological markers in the evaluation of periportal fibrosis in human Schistosoma mansoni. Memorias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762011000700004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free