Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography angiography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis

68Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Limitations of coronary computed tomography (CTA) include false-positive stenosis at calcified lesions and assessment of in-stent patency. A prototype of ultra-high resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT: 1,792 channels and 0.25-mm slice thickness×128 rows) with improved spatial resolution was developed. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery stenosis using U-HRCT. Methods and Results: Seventy-nine consecutive patients who underwent CTA using U-HRCT were prospectively included. Coronary artery stenosis was graded from 0 (no plaque) to 5 (occlusion). Stenosis grading at 102 calcified lesions was compared between U-HRCT and conventional-resolution CT (CRCT: 896 channels and 0.5-mm slice thickness×320 rows). Median stenosis grading at calcified plaque was significantly improved on U-HRCT compared with CRCT (1; IQR, 1–2 vs. 2; IQR, 1–3, P<0.0001). Assessability of in-stent lumen was evaluated on U-HRCT in 79 stents. Stent strut thickness and luminal diameter were quantitatively compared between U-HRCT and CRCT. Of 79 stents, 83.5% were assessable on U-HRCT; 80% of stents with diameter 2.5 mm were regarded as assessable. On U-HRCT, stent struts were significantly thinner (median, 0.78 mm; IQR, 0.7–0.83 mm vs. 0.83 mm; IQR, 0.75–0.92 mm, P=0.0036), and in-stent lumens were significantly larger (median, 2.08 mm; IQR, 1.55–2.51 mm vs. 1.74 mm; IQR, 1.31–2.06 mm, P<0.0001) than on CRCT. Conclusions: U-HRCT with improved spatial resolution visualized calcified lesions with fewer artifacts. The in-stent lumen of stents with diameter ≥2.5 mm was assessable on U-HRCT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Motoyama, S., Ito, H., Sarai, M., Nagahara, Y., Miyajima, K., Matsumoto, R., … Katada, K. (2018). Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography angiography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis. Circulation Journal, 82(7), 1844–1851. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free