Reply to Kurt Sylvan: Constructivism? Not Kant, not I

  • Skorupski J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Kurt Sylvan's generous discussion of my book, The Domain of Reasons, argues that its account of reason relations would be strengthened if I accepted some version of 'Kantian constructivism', and that that would, moreover, bring me closer to Kant. I argue against both …

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skorupski, J. (2016). Reply to Kurt Sylvan: Constructivism? Not Kant, not I. The Philosophical Quarterly, pqw067. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free