Embedded effort scales in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: Do they detect neurocognitive malingering?

13Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The current study examined two embedded response bias measures in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), the Effort Index (EI) and Effort Scale (ES), in relation to Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction criteria. We examined 105 individuals undergoing compensation-seeking disability evaluations. The results suggest the EI adequately differentiates the Probable/Definite Malingering group from the Incentive Only and Possible Malingering groups, while the ES does not, which is most likely representative of the current sample of disability litigants rather than its intended population of patients with amnesia. Classification accuracy statistics suggest that while the EI may not be an appropriate stand-alone measure in detecting neurocognitive malingering, it shows utility as a complementary or screening measure in forensic settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crighton, A. H., Wygant, D. B., Holt, K. R., & Granacher, R. P. (2015). Embedded effort scales in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: Do they detect neurocognitive malingering? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(3), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free