Narrative Ethics and Vulnerability: Kristeva and Ricoeur on Interdependence

  • Purcell E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The character and extent of disabilities, especially cognitive disability, have posed significance problems for existing moral theories. Certain philosophers have even questioned the moral personhood of people with disabilities and have argued that people with profound cognitive impairments should not be granted the same moral status as those who are cognitively able-bodied. This paper proposes an alternative understanding of moral personhood as relational rather than individuated. This relational moral personhood finds its foundation in the clinical practice and psychoanalysis of Julia Kristeva and the hermeneutic narrative identity of Paul Ricoeur. One consequence of this relational personhood is a new understanding of moral status through narrative co-authorship rather than intellectual or social capacity. Another consequence is a refiguration of narrative identity as narrative interdependence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Purcell, E. (2013). Narrative Ethics and Vulnerability: Kristeva and Ricoeur on Interdependence. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, 21(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2013.575

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free