Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research

34Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hall, C. M., Amelung, B., Cohen, S., Eijgelaar, E., Gössling, S., Higham, J., … Weaver, D. (2015). Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research. Tourism Management, 47, 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free