Abstract
Remember those interviews you collected for that qualitative research study? How did you address issues of interviewee power, impression management and rationality? Was it "trustworthy"? Really? In Interpreting Interviews, Mats Alvesson summarizes the current state of thought on interviews as a tool for qualitative data collection and challenges this framework as simplistic and failing to account for its complexities as a social act. Alvesson argues for a critical consciousness and pragmatic approach to interviews. This review blurs genres from autoethnography and more traditional approaches while taking Alvesson's approach, reflexive pragmatism, to its logical consequences. As a whole, Interpreting Interviews is timely, intellectually stimulating, and the latest (un)fortunate wrench in the qualitative research machine. © Copyright 2011: Brian T. Gearity and Nova Southeastern University.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gearity, B. T. (2011). A reflexive pragmatist reading of Alvesson’s interpreting interviews. Qualitative Report. Peace and Conflict Studies. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1077
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.