Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey

  • Yasuda J
  • Taniguchi M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We address the validity of the FCI, that is, whether respondents who answer FCI questions correctly have an actual understanding of the concepts of physics tested in the questions. We used sub-questions that test students on concepts believed to be required to answer the actual FCI questions. Our sample size comprises about five hundred respondents; we derive false positive ratios for pre-learners and post-learners, and evaluate the significant difference between them. Our analysis shows a significant difference at the 95 % confidence level for Q.6, Q.7, and Q.16, implying that it is possible for post-learners to answer three questions without understanding the concepts of physics tested in the questions; therefore, Q.6, Q.7 and Q.16 are invalid.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yasuda, J., & Taniguchi, M. (2017). Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey. Scientia in Educatione, 8. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free