Transcendental Idealism and Naturalism: The Case of Fichte

  • Phillips R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the relationship between naturalism and transcendental idealism in Fichte. I conclude that Fichte is a near-naturalist , akin to Baker, Lynne Rudder (2017). “Naturalism and the idea of nature,” Philosophy 92 (3): 333–349. A near-naturalist is one whose position looks akin to the naturalist in some ways but the near-naturalist can radically differ in metaphilosophical orientation and substantial commitment. This paper is composed of three sections. In the first, I outline briefly what I take transcendental idealism to be, as well as some differences in types of naturalism, and how this maps on to Fichte. In the second, I give an exegesis of Fichte’s key arguments in the Later Jena period, which are important for the question of his relationship to naturalism. In the third, I continue the exegesis with a discussion of Fichte’s conception of God, and conclude that these arguments support a near-naturalist reading of Fichte.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, R. L. (2020). Transcendental Idealism and Naturalism: The Case of Fichte. Journal of Transcendental Philosophy, 1(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2019-0013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free