Propiedades psicométricas de una escala de Percepción Materna del Vínculo Prenatal Paterno

0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The incorporation of the male parent into the reproductive process, becoming part of it, is a possibility to improve the long-term results in the tasks of parenting and overall development of the child. Creating an instrument to measure early bonding can be a strategy that optimizes resources and balances parental roles in both parents. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale Maternal Perception of the Prenatal Paternal Bonding (MPePPB). Material and method: Quantitative, observational, questionnaire validation study. The scale MPePPB, based on scientific evidence, is designed with 13 questions and three factors: "Direct interaction with the child", "Support and containment"; and "Self-analysis and correction of behavior pattern" with likert responses. Ethical committee approval. The sample was that of simple random type, corresponding to 240 puerperal women attended in a maternity of the chilean public system. Validation tests of content, construct and criteria, together with the measurement of reliability were applied Results and conclusions: 10 Factors and a single factor called Perception of paternal prenatal bonding were identified through Exploratory Factor Analysis. With an adequate internal reliability a = 0.90. It was identified that a maternal variable influences the perception of this bonding, corresponding to the planned pregnancy p value <0.0001. The MPePPB scale has adequate psychometric properties to evaluate this prenatal relationship with the parent. This study generates a validated chilean scale for future research in early paternal bonding.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guzmán-Salas, G., Contreras-García, Y., Pérez-Villalobos, C., & Manríquez-Vidal, C. (2017). Propiedades psicométricas de una escala de Percepción Materna del Vínculo Prenatal Paterno. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 82(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262017000200006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free