Diversity analysis on imbalanced data using neighbourhood and Roughly balanced bagging ensembles

Abstract

Bagging ensembles proved to work better than boosting for class imbalanced and noisy data. We compare performance and diversity of the two best performing, in this setting, bagging ensembles: Roughly Balanced Bagging (RBBag) and Neighbourhood Balanced Bagging (NBBag). We show that NBBag makes correct prediction on a higher than RBBag number of difficult to learn minority examples. Then we detect a trade-off between correct recognition of difficult minority examples and majority examples, which makes RBBag better in some cases. We also introduce a simple but effective technique to select parameters for NBBag.