The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Foot Function Index translated into Korean for use in patients with plantar fasciitis and foot/ankle fracture. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-six subjects with foot complaints, 14 males and 22 females, participated in the study. Reliability was determined by using the intra-class correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating Foot Function Index scores with the Short Form-36 and the Visual Analog Scale scores. [Results] Test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the pain subscale, and 0.94 and 0.91 for the disability and activity limitation subscales, respectively. The criterion-related validity was established by comparison with the Korean version of the Short Form-36 and Visual Analog Scale. [Conclusion] The Korean version of the Foot Function Index was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing foot complaints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

In, T. S., Jung, J. H., Kim, K., Jung, K. S., & Cho, H. Y. (2017). The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.53

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free