Obfuscating Systemic Racism: A Critical Policy Discourse Analysis on the Operation of Neoliberal Ideas in Media Representation of a School District State Takeover

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Education reform in the United States has unwisely focused attention on standards and accountability to the state as determined by standardized testing (Berliner & Biddle, 1995; Mehta, 2013). Stemming from the emphasis on standards-based accountability are the ideas of rapid school turnaround and the state’s role in this process (Peck & Reitzug, 2014; VanGronigen & Meyers, 2019). The current study employed critical policy discourse analysis to examine the media’s portrayal of the 2019 determination to continue or terminate state control of the Little Rock School District. The analysis highlights two argumentative frames—one that emphasized neoliberal values in support of continued state control of the district and another that focused on systemic racism as the basis for advocating for local control of the district. These frames, along with their implications for future actions within the educational policy making process, guide the discussion. Our findings suggest sustained community and media participation is needed to bring attention to education policy issues while underscoring the importance of taking a critical stance to assess media coverage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lopez, T. A., Riesco, H. S., & Goering, C. Z. (2023). Obfuscating Systemic Racism: A Critical Policy Discourse Analysis on the Operation of Neoliberal Ideas in Media Representation of a School District State Takeover. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.31.6707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free