The Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Methods on the Performance of Uganda Red Cross Society in Eastern Uganda

  • Bbosa S
  • Edaku C
  • Kiyingi F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper examined the influence of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) methods on the performance of the Uganda Red Cross Society (URCS) in Eastern Uganda. The study found that there is a significant relationship between M&E methods and the performance of URCS, with effective M&E methods leading to improved performance. The study also found that human resource capacity and M&E systems are important factors that influence the performance of URCS. The paper used a mixed-methods approach to collect data, including surveys, interviews, and focus groups. The paper found that URCS uses a variety of M&E methods, including logical frameworks, monitoring and evaluation plans, costed workplans, and indicator manuals. The paper also found that URCS has adequate human resource capacity for M&E, with staff members who are skilled and knowledgeable in M&E. Finally, the study found that URCS has an improved M&E system, with clear policies, procedures and a monitoring and evaluation champion. The findings suggest that URCS can improve its performance by further strengthening its M&E system. This includes ensuring that M&E is integrated into all aspects of the organization’s work, that staff members are adequately trained in M&E, and that M&E data is used to inform decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bbosa, S., Edaku, C., & Kiyingi, F. P. (2023). The Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Methods on the Performance of Uganda Red Cross Society in Eastern Uganda. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(07), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.117015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free