Prognostic factors in metastatic gastric cancer – let’s take a step forward

  • Nogueira A
  • Carvalho J
  • Jacinto P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer is the fourth cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer related mortality. Decision-making and prognosis is determined mostly by TNM. Median disease specific survival in metastatic setting is 10 months with a 5-year OS around 3-5%. Few studies identified important prognostic factors such as extent of metastatic disease, tumor markers, age, sex and receipt of treatment in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer between 2006-2012 in our institute. We aimed to identify the most important prognostic factors besides TNM. Survival analysis was carried using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In a total of 85 patients, 68.2% male, median age was 64 (34-80 years). Most patient had a good performance status (ECOG) - 38.8% 0 and 47.1% 1. The tumor grade was III (60%), I (30%) and II (10%). Primary lesion was located in the antrum (46.3%), gastric fundus/body/small curvature (32.5%) and cardia (21.3%). Stage IV was present on diagnosis in 82.1%. The metastatic sites were liver (45.8%), peritoneum (29.4%), lymph node (29.4%), lung (12.9%), pancreas (7.1%), colon (4.7%), bone (3.5%), pleura (3.5%), ovary (3.5%), kidney (2.4%) and spleen (1.2%). There was a median number of metastatic sites of 1 - 1 (66.7%), 2 (22.6%), 3 (7.1%) or 4 (3.6%). Patients presented with significant weight loss in 35.3%. The first treatment approach was palliative chemotherapy in 64.3% of patients and best supportive care (BSC) in 35.7%. The median number of chemotherapy lines was 1: 1 (39.3%), 2 (20.2%), 3 (1.2%), 4 (2.4%) and 6 (1.2%). Regarding major toxicity (grade III/IV), we reported neutropenia (14.1%), thrombocytopenia (2.4%), vomiting (2.4%), anemia (1.2%) and mucositis (1.2%). There was disease progression in 27.1% of patients, most commonly in bone (8.3%), loco regional (9.4%) and hepatic (5.9%) sites. Regarding survival, OS and PFS were significantly influenced (p<0.05) by gender, age, pleural metastasis, previous surgery to primary lesion and occurrence of neutropenia. Pancreatic metastasis had a negative influence on OS but not on PFS. Ovary and renal metastasis had a negative tendency on OS and PFS. The number of lines of chemotherapy had a positive tendency on OS. The median OS was 6.9 months, with a 12 months survival rate of 22.6% and the median PFS was 17.96 months with a 12 months PFS rate of 63.7%. Considering specific subgroups: for male population, pleural metastasis, treatment choice (BSC), neutropenia and pancreatic metastasis had a significant negative influence on OS; For females, ovary metastasis and age were the only factors affecting OS. For the diffuse type adenocarcinoma, there was a significant correlation between CA72.4 values and OS and PFS which was not found for the intestinal type. Conclusion: The average oncologist will face many cases of incurable gastric cancer. Gender (male), age (> 64 years), pleural metastasis and neutropenia had a negative and surgical approach of primary lesion had a positive prognostic impact. In some subgroups, tumor markers (CA72.4) can have a good prognostic value. Future studies need to investigate socioeconomics and molecular status.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nogueira, A., Carvalho, J., Jacinto, P., Ribeiro, J., Bonito, N., Marques, M., & Silva, R. (2017). Prognostic factors in metastatic gastric cancer – let’s take a step forward. Annals of Oncology, 28, iii44. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx261.105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free