URGENSI PERUBAHAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PROSES PEMIIHAN UMUM DI PENGADILAN TATAUSAHA NEGARA

Abstract

This article aims to answer the urgency of revising Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2017 concerning procedures for resolving disputes over the general election process at the State Administrative Court. The existence of Perma Number 5 of 2017 calls for revision for 3 (three) reasons. First, many new legal issues have arisen in Election Process Disputes related to verification tests of political parties, disputes over legislative candidates and presidential candidates. The research methodology uses a normative juridical research method, with a statutory and conceptual approach, and the analysis is carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner. This research concludes that; Revision of Perma Number 05 of 2017 needs to be carried out because; (1) The current Perma material does not explain matters that still have multiple interpretations in the Election Law; (2). The current Perma has not regulated several legal issues in a definitive conceptual manner; (3). Some of the material in the Perma is incoherent and compatible with Perbawaslu material in Bawaslu which is an Administrative Effort before going to PTUN.