Abstract
Background: The aim was to assess the clinical relevance of the World Health Organization and tumour node metastasis (TNM) classifications in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs). Methods: Prospectively collected data from 118 consecutive patients with a pNET receiving surgical intervention were analysed. Results: Forty-one patients had well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, 64 had well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and 13 had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Five-year survival rates were 95, 44 and 0 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival after R0 and R1/R2 resections in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas (P = 0.905). In those with well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, any resection and having a clinically non-functional tumour significantly increased survival (P = 0.003 and P = 0.037 respectively). The TNM stage was I in 37 patients, II in 15 patients, III in 32 patients and IV in 34 patients. There were significant differences in 5-year survival between stage I and II (88 and 85 per cent respectively) and stage HI and IV (31 and 42 per cent respectively) (P = 0.010). Conclusion: Both classifications accurately reflect the clinical outcome of patients with pNET. The resection status may not be critical for long-term survival in patients with pNET. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Fischer, L., Kleeff, J., Esposito, I., Hinz, U., Zimmermann, A., Friess, H., & Büchler, M. W. (2008). Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. British Journal of Surgery, 95(5), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6051
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.