Thinking inside the box: Comparing federated search results from google scholar, live search academic, and central search

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a comparison of Google Scholar, Windows Live Search Academic, and Serials Solutions' Central Search, relevant retrieval increases in direct relation to the complexity of the search interface. Central Search, as customized for Florida Gulf Coast University Library, permits far more complex searching than Google Scholar or Windows Academic and performs better than its simpler competitors. However, a close review of sample searches in these three databases reveals that the simpler, more streamlined interfaces may be equally useful, depending on the user's preference, and the information need. © 2008 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooke, R., & Donlan, R. (2008). Thinking inside the box: Comparing federated search results from google scholar, live search academic, and central search. Journal of Library Administration, 46(3–4), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v46n03_03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free