The effect of saw dust in a flocculent with bentonite clay and feso4 in amd treatment without addition of a neutralizer

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

200 mL of synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) was poured into five 500 mL glass beakers and treated in a jar test. The samples were dosed with 1.0–2.5 g bentonite clay, 20–60 mL of 0.025 or 0.05 M FeSO4 and 1.0–2.5 g saw dust respectively. The samples were mixed at 250 rpm for 2 minutes and reduced to 100 rpm for 10 minutes. The samples were allowed to settle for 1 hour, after which the pH, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and turbidity were measured (exp. A). Two other similar sets of experiments were conducted by dosing the samples with a combination of bentonite clay and FeSO4 with and without saw dust, similar treatment and measurements (exp. B and exp. C), similar treatment and measurements were conducted. The pH and the efficiencies of the flocculants containing 0.025 and 0.05 M Fe3þ in FeSO4 are similarly identical. The removal of turbid materials from the samples with FeSO4 is the lowest, followed by a combination of bentonite clay and FeSO4, whereas a combination of bentonite clay, FeSO4 and saw dust the highest. Comparative removal efficiencies between the two flocculants show that the presence of FeSO4 is relatively insignificant. The removal efficiency of a combination of bentonite clay, FeSO4 and saw dust from AMD sample is low with for Cu2þ, and optimal for both Ni2þ and Fe2þ ions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ntwampe, I. O. (2019). The effect of saw dust in a flocculent with bentonite clay and feso4 in amd treatment without addition of a neutralizer. Water Practice and Technology, 14(3), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2019.051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free