Comparison of methohexital and propofol as induction agents for evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs

10Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the influence of propofol or methohexital, with and without doxapram, on the examination of laryngeal function in dogs. Study design: Experimental study. Animals: Forty healthy dogs randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol with saline (n = 10), propofol with doxapram (n = 10), methohexital with saline (n = 10), or methohexital with doxapram (n = 10). Methods: Propofol and methohexital were administered to effect. Investigators examined laryngeal function (initial) simultaneously with video laryngoscopy. Doxapram or saline was administered, and laryngeal function was reevaluated (second). Laryngeal motion, quality of laryngeal exposure, and the degree of swallowing, laryngospasm, and jaw tone were scored at each evaluation. Adverse events were recorded. Initial and second videos were evaluated by a masked observer, and still images obtained from both evaluations were evaluated for change in rima glottidis size by 2 masked observers. Results: Administration of doxapram and saline was delayed with propofol (P =.001). Laryngeal function did not differ between dogs receiving propofol or methohexital, irrespective of doxapram administration. Doxapram improved breathing scores in both groups (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, M. B., Dugat, D. R., Lyon, S. D., Nafe, L. A., Payton, M. E., Peakheart, S. K., & Salazar, R. S. (2019). Comparison of methohexital and propofol as induction agents for evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 48(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free