This Hearing Should Be Flipped: Democratic Spectatorship, Social Media, and the Problem of Demagogic Candor

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How concerning should it be that most citizens encounter political life chiefly as audiences? Facing this fact, democratic theorists increasingly respond by reconceptualizing the spectator as an empowered agent. Yet this response risks overlooking how evolving forms of media reconstitute audiences in ways that undermine efforts to ascribe agency to any given spectating activity. To illustrate this problem, I consider Jeffrey Green's idealization of candor, which holds spectators to be empowered when leaders are denied scripted appearances. In contrast, I show that social media occasion a case of irreverent candor wherein spectators claim authenticity by derailing online conversations, thereby valorizing a kind of unscriptedness that perpetuates outgroup marginalization and facilitates demagogy. Paradoxically, such candor disempowers spectators while rendering them more active agents. I thus argue that empowerment requires audiences to interrogate their own spectating practices - a possibility I locate in Hannah Arendt's thought and interactions surrounding Black Lives Matter protests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Litvin, B. (2023). This Hearing Should Be Flipped: Democratic Spectatorship, Social Media, and the Problem of Demagogic Candor. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free