Identifying relevant information in medical conversations to summarize a clinician-patient encounter

16Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To inform the development of automated summarization of clinical conversations, this study sought to estimate the proportion of doctor-patient communication in general practice (GP) consultations used for generating a consultation summary. Two researchers with a medical degree read the transcripts of 44 GP consultations and highlighted the phrases to be used for generating a summary of the consultation. For all consultations, less than 20% of all words in the transcripts were needed for inclusion in the summary. On average, 9.1% of all words in the transcripts, 26.6% of all medical terms, and 27.3% of all speaker turns were highlighted. The results indicate that communication content used for generating a consultation summary makes up a small portion of GP consultations, and automated summarization solutions—such as digital scribes—must focus on identifying the 20% relevant information for automatically generating consultation summaries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quiroz, J. C., Laranjo, L., Kocaballi, A. B., Briatore, A., Berkovsky, S., Rezazadegan, D., & Coiera, E. (2020). Identifying relevant information in medical conversations to summarize a clinician-patient encounter. Health Informatics Journal, 26(4), 2906–2914. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220951719

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free