Recurrent gram-negative bacteremia: Incidence and clinical patterns

30Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fifty-eight patients who had at least two episodes of gram-negative bacteremia were evaluated to define the epidemiology of recurrent bacteremia caused by these organisms. Thirty-two patients (55%) had single relapses, 16 (28%) had one reinfection, and 10 (17%) bad more than one recurrence of bacteremia. Intravenous catheters were the most common probable source of bacteremia. Relapses occurred earlier after the initial episode than did reinfections (58 days vs. 292 days; P = .002). The duration of antibiotic therapy for the first episode was shorter for patients with relapses than for those with reinfections (13.9 days vs. 17.5 days; P = .046). Microorganisms causing recurrent bacteremic episodes were not unusually resistant to antimicrobial agents. Reinfections may be difficult to prevent because they are associated with the severity of the underlying illness, which may not improve. The frequency of relapses might be reduced by increasing the duration of antibiotic therapy and eliminating loci of infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wendt, C., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Pfaller, M. A., Wenzel, R. P., & Herwaldt, L. A. (1999). Recurrent gram-negative bacteremia: Incidence and clinical patterns. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 28(3), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1086/515152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free