Abstract
Peer tutoring non-native writers seems to pose particular challenges to tutors with regard to the overall goals and principles of peer tutoring that have been expressed in the literature. Principles such as nondirectivity and long-term emphasis on the process quality of writing are often assumed to be in conflict with non-native writers’ desire to be actively and directly guided in their process of learning to write in a foreign language. Peer tutoring’s appropriateness therefore remains rather controversial within this particular context. In this article we outline the results of an empirical study focusing on the potential, as well as the limitations, of peer tutoring with regard to non-native writers in a German writing center. Using the method of qualitative content analysis designed to achieve a healthy balance between deductive and inductive aspects of empirical research, we ask the open question: ‘How do peer tutors deal with nonnative writers?’ Results show that the limitations of rigid peer tutoring principles become obvious more quickly with non-native writers. However, peer tutoring with non-native writers reveals larger potential, too, and can offer recommendations for peer tutoring in general.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Voigt, A., & Girgensohn, K. (2015). Peer Tutoring in Academic Writing with Non-Native Writers in a German Writing Center – Results of an Empirical Study. Journal of Academic Writing, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v5i1.152
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.