Reduced type-A carbohydrate-binding module interactions to cellulose I leads to improved endocellulase activity

20Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Dissociation of nonproductively bound cellulolytic enzymes from cellulose is hypothesized to be a key rate-limiting factor impeding cost-effective biomass conversion to fermentable sugars. However, the role of carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) in enabling nonproductive enzyme binding is not well understood. Here, we examine the subtle interplay of CBM binding and cellulose hydrolysis activity for three models type-A CBMs (Families 1, 3a, and 64) tethered to multifunctional endoglucanase (CelE) on two distinct cellulose allomorphs (i.e., cellulose I and III). We generated a small library of mutant CBMs with varying cellulose affinity, as determined by equilibrium binding assays, followed by monitoring cellulose hydrolysis activity of CelE–CBM fusion constructs. Finally, kinetic binding assays using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation were employed to measure CBM adsorption and desorption rate constants (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.), respectively, towards nanocrystalline cellulose derived from both allomorphs. Overall, our results indicate that reduced CBM equilibrium binding affinity towards cellulose I alone, resulting from increased desorption rates ((Formula presented.)) and reduced effective adsorption rates ((Formula presented.)), is correlated to overall improved endocellulase activity. Future studies could employ similar approaches to unravel the role of CBMs in nonproductive enzyme binding and develop improved cellulolytic enzymes for industrial applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nemmaru, B., Ramirez, N., Farino, C. J., Yarbrough, J. M., Kravchenko, N., & Chundawat, S. P. S. (2021). Reduced type-A carbohydrate-binding module interactions to cellulose I leads to improved endocellulase activity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(3), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free