Reliability and viability of using the multidimensional fatigue inventory-20 in patients with chronic coronary artery disease

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To verify the reliability and viability estimates of using the translated and adapted version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for use in Brazil in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Method: A methodological study. The instrument was answered by the participants without the help of the researchers. Filling time was recorded, and facilities and difficulties were documented. The viability of use was analyzed through acceptability, practicality, ceiling and floor effects. Reliability was estimated by internal consistency. Results: The sample consisted of 201 participants. The mean fatigue score was 51.9 + 14.0. There was a small rate of unanswered items (0.65%), although 30.3% of participants requested some clarification after reading the instructions; 37.3% reported that they had doubts when answering the items, especially number 19. The response time was 4.8 + 1.9 minutes. There were no ceiling or floor effects. The reliability estimate was adequate. Conclusion: The instrument needs adjustments to the wording of the instructions and some items, although it has good acceptability and reliability estimates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Freitas Antonio, D. A., Muller, A. G., & e Silva Butcher, R. de C. G. (2019). Reliability and viability of using the multidimensional fatigue inventory-20 in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018029203511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free