Late outcomes of subcostal exchange of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: A word of caution

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Previous studies have shown the usefulness of the subcostal exchange of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device for device malfunction. However, long-term data are still limited. METHODS Between March 2004 and July 2017, 41 of 568 (7.2%) patients who had received a HeartMate II implant at our institution had a device exchange via a subcostal incision. We summarized early and late outcomes. RESULTS Forty-one patients had a total of 48 subcostal pump exchanges. Indications for device exchange included device thrombosis (n = 31, 76%), driveline infection (n = 2, 5%) and driveline injury (n = 8, 19%). All of the procedures were successful, and there were no in-hospital deaths. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed 30-day and 1-year survival rates after subcostal exchange of 100% and 94.6%, respectively. However, 10 (25%) patients had left ventricular assist device-related infections following subcostal exchange that included 7 pump pocket infections and 3 driveline infections. Freedom from left ventricular assist device-related infection at 1 year after subcostal exchange was 79.3%. Thirteen (32%) patients had device malfunction due to pump thrombosis that required a 2nd device exchange. Seven patients had recurrent thrombosis. Three (7%) patients had a stroke. Freedom from device thrombosis and from a stroke event at 1 year was 74.4%. CONCLUSIONS Subcostal pump exchange can be safely performed. However, there is a substantial risk of infection and recurrent thrombosis. Careful follow-up for late complications is mandatory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, S. N., Takayama, H., Han, J., Garan, A. R., Kurlansky, P., Yuzefpolskaya, M., … Takeda, K. (2018). Late outcomes of subcostal exchange of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: A word of caution. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 54(4), 652–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free