Secondary debulking for ovarian carcinoma relapse: The r-r dilemma – is the prognosis different for residual or recurrent disease?

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the kind of ovarian cancer relapse by separating residual from recurrent disease and correlating them with patient survival. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 200 women with ovarian carcinoma relapse between 2005 and 2017. Results: The main sites of residual disease included the great omentum, epiploic appendices, liver round ligament, gallbladder, and cervical/ vaginal stump. The median survival for women with residual disease treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) + systemic chemotherapy was 38 months compared with the control group, which reached 23.8 months. The morbidity rates were 18% vs 7%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 2.5% vs 1.3%. The main sites of recurrent disease included the mesenterium, pelvic floor, diaphragm, and Glisson’s capsule. Women with recurrent disease treated with CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy had median survival rates of 26 months vs 16 months in the control group. The morbidity rates were 22% vs 15%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 3.3% vs 0%. Conclusion: Patients undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse have a different prognosis when compared with patients with residual and recurrent disease. A different prognosis is presented in women undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse when comparing patients with residual and recurrent disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spiliotis, J. D., Iavazzo, C., Kopanakis, N. D., & Christopoulou, A. (2019). Secondary debulking for ovarian carcinoma relapse: The r-r dilemma – is the prognosis different for residual or recurrent disease? Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association, 20(4), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2018.0165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free