Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What are foundational competencies in educational measurement? We published a framework for these foundational competencies in this journal (Ackerman et al. 2024) and were grateful to receive eight commentaries raising a number of important questions about the framework and its implications. We identified five cross-cutting recommendations among the eight commentaries relating to (1) our process and purpose, (2) Artificial Intelligence, (3) ethical competencies, (4) qualitative, critical, and culturally responsive commentaries, and (5) intersecting professions in, for example, classroom assessment and content development. In this rejoinder, we respond to these five recommendations and to each of the eight commentaries in turn. We hope that discussion and consensus about foundational competencies in educational measurement continue to advance in our journals and our field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ho, A. D., Ackerman, T. A., Bandalos, D. L., Briggs, D. C., Everson, H. T., Lottridge, S. M., … Wind, S. A. (2024, September 1). Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free