A unit for source and protective isolation in a general hospital

21Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An isolation unit consisting of 12 ventilated cubicles was investigated over 18 months. Out of 462 patients admitted, 262 (57%) required source and 200 (43%) protective isolation. Admissions of patients with staphylococcal sepsis fell from 16 in the first three months to six in the last three months. Staphylococcus aureus was recovered from 12% of nurses' fingers and often in small numbers from protective clothing and uniforms, but only two patients acquired a strain from a nurse or another patient. Gram-negative bacilli were rarely recovered from hands or protective clothing of nurses, and there was no evidence of spread of infectious diseases. This inexpensive unit, with simple but efficient isolation-nursing techniques, successfully prevented the spread of infection. © 1979, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayliffe, G. A. J., Babb, J. R., Taylor, L., & Wise, R. (1979). A unit for source and protective isolation in a general hospital. British Medical Journal, 2(6188), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6188.461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free