The Outcome of the Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Lateral Position with Guidance of Non-Rotational C-Arm

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the outcome of the miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of nephrolithiasis with a lateral position based on the principle of a right triangle under the guidance of a C-Arm without contrast fluid. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cases of Mini-PCNL with the assistance of a vacuum-assisted sheath in the lateral position were performed at Central Hospital from March 2021 to August 2022. Percutaneous renal access was under the guidance of a non-rotational C-arm without contrast medium, and we determined the puncture location and depth of the needle based on the principle of right triangles. Results: The median age was 51.6 ± 12.5 years, and males accounted for 68.1% of the cases. 60.9% of all patients had normal weight. The median stone surface area was 361.1mm2, and 59.4% of all cases were graded as 2 regarding Guy’s stone score. The successful renal access rate was 100%. The tunnel access from the middle and lower calyx accounted for 94.2%. The median access duration, fluoroscopy duration, and hospital length of stay were 271.7 seconds, 14.79 seconds, and 6.3 days, respectively. The complete stone clearance rate was 78.3%. Bleeding complications occurred in 2 patients without mortality. Three patients required an additional procedure. Conclusion: The puncture technique into the renal calyxes based on the principle of the right triangle under the guidance of a non-rotational C-Arm without contrast medium in PCNL is a fast, exact, and safe technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pham, N. H., Hoang, V. T., Bui, C. L. K., Nguyen, V. Q. A., Truong, V. C., & Hampton, L. J. (2024). The Outcome of the Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Lateral Position with Guidance of Non-Rotational C-Arm. Research and Reports in Urology, 16, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S442145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free