The purpose of this article is to provide a comparison of institution-based community organizing and deliberative practices and to demonstrate how these are complementary approaches for civic engagement. In contrast to older typologies describing these two approaches oppositionally, we seek to reveal a shared democratic ethos and propose greater collaboration between action-oriented organizers and deliberative advocates. The article also identifies where deliberative and organizing practices diverge and proposes a model for how the two approaches can be integrated for mutual benefit.
CITATION STYLE
Rusch, L., & Swarts, H. (2015). Practices of Engagement: Comparing and Integrating Deliberation and Organizing. Journal of Community Practice, 23(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2014.985411
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.