Human tryptases α and β/II are functionally distinct due, in part, to a single amino acid difference in one of the surface loops that forms the substrate-binding cleft

82Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Tryptases α andβ/II were expressed in insect cells to try to ascertain why human mast cells express these two nearly identical granule proteases. In contrast to that proposed by others, residue -3 in the propeptide did not appear to be essential for the three-dimensional folding, post-translational modification, and/or activation of this family of serine proteases. Both recombinant tryptases were functional and bound the active-site inhibitor diisopropyl fluorophosphate. However, they differed in their ability to cleave varied trypsin-susceptible chromogenic substrates. Structural modeling analyses revealed that tryptase α differs from tryptase β/II in that it possesses an Asp, rather than a Gly, in one of the loops that form its substrate-binding cleft. A site-directed mutagenesis approach was therefore carried out to determine the importance of this residue. Because the D215G derivative of tryptase α exhibited potent enzymatic activity against fibrinogen and other tryptase β/II-susceptible substrates, Asp215 dominantly restricts the substrate specificity of tryptase α. These data indicate for the first time that tryptases α and β/II are functionally different human proteases. Moreover, the variation of just a single amino acid in the substrate-binding cleft of a tryptase can have profound consequences in the regulation of its enzymatic activity and/or substrate preference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, C., Li, L., Krilis, S. A., Chanasyk, K., Tang, Y., Li, Z., … Stevens, R. L. (1999). Human tryptases α and β/II are functionally distinct due, in part, to a single amino acid difference in one of the surface loops that forms the substrate-binding cleft. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 274(28), 19670–19676. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.28.19670

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free