Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation

13Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aortic valve reimplantation has been shown to be a safe procedure. However, evidences of durability in bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) are limited in the literature. Between 2002 and 2011, 132 patients (mean age 61 ± 12 years) underwent aortic valve reimplantation. In 24 patients (18%), aortic valve was bicuspid. Mean follow-up was 50 ± 26 months (range 1-102 months) and was 99% complete. In-hospital mortality was 0.8% (1 patient). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 99 and 94%, respectively. Overall freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 1 and 5 years was 96 and 90%, respectively, without significant difference between patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Freedom from aortic valve regurgitation >2+/4+, excluding patients reoperated, was at 1 and 5 years of 100 and 99%, respectively. Patients with valve cusp repair showed a higher rate of aortic valve reoperation; however, only postoperative aortic regurgitation >2+/4+ was significant risk factor for redo procedure at multivariate analysis. Aortic valve reimplantation in BAV without cusp repair provides excellent mid-term results. Further observations and longer follow-up are necessary to determine if BAV sparing, even in the presence of cusps alterations, could allow satisfying durability. © 2012 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malvindi, P. G., Raffa, G. M., Basciu, A., Citterio, E., Cappai, A., Ornaghi, D., … Settepani, F. (2012). Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 14(6), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free