A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting

158Citations
Citations of this article
333Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Handwriting difficulties are among the most common reasons for referral of children to occupational therapy. Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of handwriting interventions. Methods: A systematic review was carried out. Included studies were randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials of interventions that could be used by an occupational therapist to improve written output (printing or writing) among school-aged children identified as having difficulties with handwriting. Electronic searches of relevant databases were conducted up to January 2010. Findings: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies tested (1) relaxation and practice with or without EMG, (2) sensory-based training without handwriting practice, and (3) handwriting-based practice (including sensory-focused or cognitive focused handwriting practice). Regardless of treatment type, interventions that did not include handwriting practice and those that included less than 20 practice sessions were ineffective. Implications: Effective occupational therapy for improving handwriting must include adequate handwriting practice. © CAOT PUBLICATIONS ACE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoy, M. M. P., Egan, M. Y., & Feder, K. P. (2011, February). A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free