Comment on "reinterpreting aircraft measurement in anisotropic scaling turbulence" by Lovejoy et al. (2009)

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recently, Lovejoy et al. (2009) argued that the steep ∼k-3 atmospheric kinetic energy spectrum at synoptic scales (≥1000 km) observed by aircraft is a spurious artefact of aircraft following isobars instead of isoheights. Without taking into account the earth's rotation they hypothesise that the horizontal atmospheric energy spectrum should scale as k-5/3 at all scales. We point out that the approximate k -3-spectrum at synoptic scales has been observed by a number of non-aircraft means since the 1960s and that general circulation models and other current models have successfully produced this spectrum. We also argue that the vertical movements of the aircraft are far too small to cause any strong effect on the measured spectrum at synoptic scales.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindborg, E., Tung, K. K., Nastrom, G. D., N. Cho, J. Y., & Gage, K. S. (2010). Comment on “reinterpreting aircraft measurement in anisotropic scaling turbulence” by Lovejoy et al. (2009). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1401-2010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free