Action science in information science: a qualitative method in Analisys

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: It presents a critical reflection on the construction of scientific knowledge from the action research method in Information Science, showing how this method has been used in studies on information skills in Brazil and abroad. It presents a pioneering discussion in the field of Information Science about the types or ways of working this method, emphasizing Action Science. Methods: Methodologically, it consisted of a qualitative research, interpretative approach, which used the techniques of bibliographic research and document analysis. We identified 27 national articles and 19 international articles pertinent to action research, published from 2008 to 2018, and retrieved by the Capes Journal Portal. Results: It has been found that action research is used in studies with diversified purposes, such as the elaboration of thesauri, tutorials, models, collection development policies, information skills programs and information policies. As a qualitative research method, it has been identified that there are five types or ways of working on action research, namely: Traditional, contextual, educational, radical, and action science. However, there is no evidence that the action science method of action science has been approached in the field of Information Science in Brazil. Abroad there are only two works with approximate characteristics. Conclusions: Contributes to the scientific field by presenting the definition, origin and characteristics of Action Science, discussing the feasibility and potential use of this method in the field of Information Science and in an ongoing Thesis research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Almeida, J. L. S., Perucchi, V., & De Araújo Freire, G. H. (2020). Action science in information science: a qualitative method in Analisys. Encontros Bibli, 25, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e66993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free