The fiber orientation in the coronary arterial wall at physiological loading evaluated with a two-fiber constitutive model

13Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A patient-specific mechanical description of the coronary arterial wall is indispensable for individualized diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. A way to determine the artery's mechanical properties is to fit the parameters of a constitutive model to patient-specific experimental data. Clinical data, however, essentially lack information about the stress-free geometry of an artery, which is necessary for constitutive modeling. In previous research, it has been shown that a way to circumvent this problem is to impose extra modeling constraints on the parameter estimation procedure. In this study, we propose a new modeling constraint concerning the in-situ fiber orientation (βphys). βphys,which is amajor contributor to the arterial stress-strain behavior, was determined for porcine and human coronary arteries using a mixed numerical-experimental method. The in-situ situation was mimicked using in-vitro experiments at a physiological axial pre-stretch, in which pressure-radius and pressure-axial force were measured. A single-layered, hyperelastic, thick-walled, two-fiber material model was accurately fitted to the experimental data, enabling the computation of stress, strain, and fiber orientation. βphys was found to be almost equal for all vessels measured (36.4 ± 0.3) °, which theoretically can be explained using netting analysis. In further research, this finding can be used as an extra modeling constraint in parameter estimation from clinical data. © Springer-Verlag 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Der Horst, A., Van Den Broek, C. N., Van De Vosse, F. N., & Rutten, M. C. M. (2012). The fiber orientation in the coronary arterial wall at physiological loading evaluated with a two-fiber constitutive model. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 11(3–4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0331-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free