Abstract
A cold–induced vasodilation (CIVD) test was administered to 113 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) soldiers (age 25.6 ± 6 yrs) during pre-deployment to a Canadian Arctic training exercise. The incidence and rates/types of subsequent peripheral cold injuries, as well as the relationship of CIVD responses against other hypothesized/reported risk factors (smoking, gender, age, ethnicity and prior cold injury), were analyzed. Although there was a wide range of CIVD RIF (resistance index to frostbite) scores (mean = 5.0 ± 1.5), there were no systematic relationships between RIF and injury type/location and rate, and the other risk factors analyzed. The absence of physiological links to cold injury occurrence suggests that in a military cold deployment setting, other factors are in play, which might include clothing, training, leadership and doctrine. These factors should be examined in future work.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sullivan-Kwantes, W., Moes, K., Limmer, R., & Goodman, L. (2019). Finger cold-induced vasodilation test does not predict subsequent cold injuries: A lesson from the 2018 Canadian Forces Exercise. Temperature, 6(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2019.1574200
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.