Evaluation of lamina papyracea dehiscence with paranasal computed tomography

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The lamina papyracea is the thin line between the ethmoid sinus and the medial orbital wall. Knowledge of the presence of the lamina papyracea dehiscence (LPD) bears critical importance to prevent misdiagnosis of fractures at this level and to define the anatomy before sinonasal surgery, including Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). The present study is therefore intended to determine the incidence of LPD in paranasal computed tomography, to identify its imaging characteristics in CT, and to compare with the literature. Materials and methods: The current study included patients who underwent paranasal CT scanning for any reason in our clinic between January 2018 and January 2022. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and presence of LPD. Patients with dehiscence were evaluated in terms of age, gender, dehiscence localization (right, left), tissue at the level of dehiscence, dehiscence size, and dehiscence grade. Results: 1000 patients with a mean age of 32. ± 16.3 (min = 18-max = 79) were included in the study. 20 patients (2%) were found to have LPD. Of those with LPD, 14 (70%) were grade 1, 4 (20%) were grade 2 and 2 (10%) were grade 3. Again of those with LPD, 14 (70%) had LPD localized on the right and 6 (30%) had LPD on the left. In 12 (60%) of the patients with LPD, herniated tissue was detected. Among these patients with herniation, fatty tissue herniation was observed in 10 (83.3%) and medial rectus muscle herniation was observed in 2 (16.7%). Discussion and Conclusion: Comprehensive evaluation for and identification of LPD are very important before possible sinus surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deniz, M. A., & Tekinhatun, M. (2024). Evaluation of lamina papyracea dehiscence with paranasal computed tomography. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 281(7), 3649–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08538-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free