The dual role of state shareholders in disclosed corporate misconduct: Evidence from China

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

By adopting a legitimacy perspective rooted in institutional theory, this study investigates the dual role of state ownership in corporate misconduct in emerging economies: monitoring role constraining misconduct commission and patronage role leading to less disclosure. Using a sample of listed firms in China, we find a negative relationship between state ownership and corporate misconduct. Furthermore, the negative effect of state ownership on misconduct will be stronger when the firm affiliation is high and the firm has politically connected executives. The impact will be weaker when the number of local listed firms is greater and the regional inspection is intense.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, C. (2023). The dual role of state shareholders in disclosed corporate misconduct: Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(3), 1732–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free