A switch from originator-adalimumab to the biosimilar SB5 in patients with Crohn’s disease: an analysis of two propensity score-matched cohorts

10Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background/aims: Originator-adalimumab, an established treatment for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), showed no difference in efficacy or adverse events versus adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (SB5-adalimumab) over 10 weeks (W) of treatment. To understand the long-term effectiveness of SB5-adalimumab in CD, patients switched from originator-adalimumab to SB5-adalimumab were compared with patients remaining on originator-adalimumab over 104 W. Methods: Data on patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with CD and treated at ISCARE, were collected prospectively from July 2018 to January 2021. Primary outcome: clinical disease activity at W52, measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Secondary outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC) and adalimumab concentrations at W10, 26, 52 and 104, and treatment persistence. To ensure comparable cohorts, patients were propensity score (PS)-matched for age, gender and disease activity. Results: After matching, 54 patients remained per cohort. At W52, mean (SD) HBI score was 3.2 (2.5) for originator-adalimumab and 4.0 [3.6] for SB5-adalimumab (difference [95% CI] −0.78 [−2.8, 1.3]; n = 18/cohort); no clinically meaningful differences in CRP, FC or drug concentrations were noted. Kaplan–Meier’s estimates (95% CI) of remaining on treatment were originator-adalimumab: 0.870 (0.785–0.965) versus SB5-adalimumab: 0.648 (0.533–0.789) at W52 and significantly lower for SB5-adalimumab versus originator-adalimumab (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lukas, M., Kolar, M., Reissigova, J., Duricova, D., Machkova, N., Hruba, V., … Malickova, K. (2022). A switch from originator-adalimumab to the biosimilar SB5 in patients with Crohn’s disease: an analysis of two propensity score-matched cohorts. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 57(7), 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2041082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free