Abstract
Sites of urban agriculture are often contested urban open spaces. In the current dominant ideal of the ‘competitive’ and ‘global’ city, little recognition is given to the potential benefits of urban agriculture, beyond beautification, subsistence or therapeutic purposes. In this context, urban agriculture is often viewed as an activity performed by ‘gardeners’, either contributing to individual well-being or reducing the costs of maintenance of public spaces. A less ‘tolerant’ perspective perceives such ‘gardeners’ as squatters inhibiting cities' productivity. By contrast, urban agriculture enthusiasts advocate the recognition of the right to farm in the city as an essential condition for either food security or food sovereignty. This paper argues that urban agriculture can also be interpreted as a means to claim, nurture and propagate alternative views on spatial justice, place and citizenship-making, defying the maldistributional and misrecognition patterns that typically produce and reproduce unequal u...
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Allen, A., & Apsan Frediani, A. (2013). Farmers, not gardeners. City, 17(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.796620
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.