Moral Reasoning Theory: Between Kohlberg’s and al-Ghazali’s Perspective

7Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the moral theory in al-Ghazali's classic Islamic compared Kohlberg's theory of moral level. The method used is the document analysis method with references to al-Ghazali works 'Ihya' Ulum al-Din's and articles related to Kohlberg's theory. The results show that there are similarities in the theory of moral level developed by al-Ghazali with Kohlberg, although there are also have differences. The level of moral reasoning classified by Kohlberg are divided into three which are preconventional, conventional and post-conventional which have similarities to al-Ghazali's moral classifications of the `awam, the khawas, and the khawas al-khawas. The difference is that Kohlberg's moral level is purely cognitive in its focus on moral reasoning, whereas al-Ghazali's moral level is on moral reasoning as well as behaviour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Md Sham, F., Yaqin, A., & Wachidah, H. N. (2021). Moral Reasoning Theory: Between Kohlberg’s and al-Ghazali’s Perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 20, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.20.2021.207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free