Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: Results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities

50Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Danish return-to-work (RTW) program on long-term sickness absence in a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities. Methods The intervention group comprised 1948 participants while the control group comprised 1157 participants receiving ordinary sickness benefit management (OSM). Study participants were working-age adults receiving long-term (≥8 weeks or more) benefits, included regardless of reason for sickness absence or employment status. Each beneficiary was followed-up for a maximum period of 52 weeks. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for return to work (RTW) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results The intervention effect differed significantly between the municipalities (P=0.00005). In one municipality (M2) the intervention resulted in a statistically significant increased rate of recovery from long-term sickness absence (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.74). In the other two municipalities, the intervention did not show a statistically significant effect (HRM1 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.29, and HRM3 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.03, respectively). Adjustment for a series of possible confounders only marginally altered the estimated HR. Conclusion The effect of the intervention differed substantially between the three municipalities, indicating that that contextual factors are of major importance for success or failure of this complex intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poulsen, O. M., Aust, B., Bjorner, J. B., Rugulies, R., Hansen, J. V., Tverborgvik, T., … Nielsen, M. B. D. (2014). Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: Results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 40(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3383

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free