The Geschwind–Behan–Galaburda model (GBGM) of cerebral lateralization: a critique and prospective

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the wake of, and as a complement to, a recently published major meta-analytic review of empirical support of the Geschwind–Behan–Galaburda model (GBGM) of cerebral lateralization (CL) the present brief essay attempts to present a critical assessment of the theoretical approach underlying the GBGM. The GBGM is criticized for having been misguided in its representation of the cerebral basis of handedness, and of the links between testosterone and immune function. Some guidelines are presented for the development of a general theory of CL, emphasizing animal research, greater interdisciplinary communication, a hierarchical model-building approach, and the relevance of neuropharmacology and psychiatry. © 1996, Rapid Science Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braun, C. M. J. (1996). The Geschwind–Behan–Galaburda model (GBGM) of cerebral lateralization: a critique and prospective. Behavioural Neurology, 9(3–4), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1155/1996/503927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free