Glycaemic control and body mass index in late-adolescents and young adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A population-based study

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: Studies of children with diabetes up to the age of 15 years report deteriorating glycaemic control in the early teenage years. The aim was to investigate glycaemia and body mass index in older teenagers and young adults. Method: A Scottish, regional, population-based, cross-sectional study of 255 young people (117 female, 138 male) with Type 1 diabetes, aged 15-25 years (mean ± sd 19.8 ± 2.8 years, diabetes duration: 8.8 ± 5.4 years) registered on a diabetes database. Glycaemic control, body mass index (BMI) and insulin regimens were assessed in three age groups [group 1 (n = 96) 15-18 years; group 2 (n = 74) 18.1-22 years; and group 3 (n = 85) 22.1-25 years]. Results: Subjects in the oldest age group had a significantly lower mean HbA1c than those in the youngest age group (8.8 ± 1.7 vs. 9.9 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001). Mean BMI was higher in group 3 (25.2 ± 3.4 kg/m2) compared with group 1 (23.9 ± 3.1 kg/m2; P < 0.001). HbA1c levels were higher in the younger subjects and women. Lower HbA1c levels were associated with a higher BMI (r = -0.324, P < 0.001) in men only. Overall, 74% took three or more injections a day, of whom 60% were on basal/bolus therapy. The proportion on basal/bolus insulin therapy increased with age and duration of diabetes. Conclusion: Compared with adolescents, young adults with Type 1 diabetes have better glycaemic control and higher BMI. This was associated with lower insulin requirements. © 2008 The Authors.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acharya, S. H., Philip, S., Viswanath, A. K., Boroujerdi, M., Waugh, N. R., & Pearson, D. W. M. (2008). Glycaemic control and body mass index in late-adolescents and young adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A population-based study. Diabetic Medicine, 25(3), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02372.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free