Cost-effectiveness of relapse-prevention cognitive therapy for bipolar disorder: 30-Month study

Abstract

Background: We have reported the advantageous clinical outcome of adding cognitive therapy to medication in the prevention of relapse of bipolar disorder. Aims: This 30-month study compares the cost-effectiveness of cognitive therapy with standard care. Method: We randomly allocated 103 individuals with bipolar I disorder to standard treatment and cognitive therapy plus standard treatment. Service use and costs were measured at 3-month intervals and cost-effectiveness was assessed using the net-benefit approach. Results: The group receiving cognitive therapy had significantly better clinical outcomes. The extra costs were offset by reduced service use elsewhere. The probability of cognitive therapy being cost-effective was high and robust to different therapy prices. Conclusions: Combination of cognitive therapy and mood stabilisers was superior to mood stabilisers alone in terms of clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness for those with frequent relapses of bipolar disorder.