Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale

145Citations
Citations of this article
310Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. TTOBJECTIVES: To investigate the minimum important difference (MID) of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) across 3 levels of patient-perceived global rating of change in a clinical setting. TTBACKGROUND: The MID varies depending on the external anchor defining patient-perceived "importance. " The MID for the PSFS has not beene stablished across all body regions. TTMETHODS: One thousand seven hundred eight consecutive patients with musculoskeletal disorders were recruited from 5 physical therapy clinics. The PSFS, NPRS, and 4 region-specific outcome measures-the Oswestry Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, Upper Extremity Functional Index, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale-were assessed at the initial and final physical therapy visits. Global rating of change was assessed at the final visit. MID was calculated for the PSFS and NPRS (overall and for each body region), and for each region-specific outcome measure, across 3 levels of change defined by the global rating of change (small, medium, large change) using receiver operating characteristic curve methodology. TTRESULTS: The MID for the PSFS (on a scale from 0 to 10) ranged from 1.3 (small change) to 2.3 (medium change) to 2.7 (large change), and was relatively stable across body regions. MIDs for the NPRS (-1.5 to -3.5), Oswestry Disability Index (-12), Neck Disability Index (-14), Upper Extremity Functional Index (6 to 11), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (9 to 16) are also reported. TTCONCLUSION: We reported the MID for small, medium, and large patient-perceived change onthe PSFS, NPRS, Oswestry Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, Upper Extremity Functional Index, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale for use in clinical practice and research. © 2014 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy®.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abbott, J. H., & Schmitt, J. (2014). Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 44(8), 560–564. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.5248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free